Notes - Approved
Meeting Notes
Kale Braden
Dyne Eifertsen
Kevin Porter
Linda Zarzana
Joe Rust
Anthony Giusti
Damon Antos
Cristina Domokos
Lydia Engelsgaard
Kevyn Montano
Erika Wescoatt
Diana Hicks
Steven Segura
Cheryl Sears
NAME OF COUNCIL/TEAM: Enterprise Level Scheduling Solution - ELSS (2018-2019) | |||
OBJECTIVE OF MEETING: ELSS | |||
DATE OF MEETING: 12/07/2018 TIME: 10:00am |
LOCATION/ROOM #: CTL CALL-IN NUMBER:+1 646 876 9923 or +1 669 900 6833 CALL-IN CODE: 150 591 710 |
||
FACILITATOR(S): Kale Braden, Dyne Efeirtsen, Kevyn Montano | |||
ASSISTANT: Kevin Porter | |||
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charles Braden, Gizella Engelsgaard, Kevyn Montano, Steven Segura, Linda Zarzana, Dyne Eifertsen, Kevin Porter. | |||
INVITED GUEST(S): | |||
SUPPORTING RESOURCES (ITEMS READ IN PREPARATION FOR AND/OR BROUGHT TO MEETING): | |||
Attached Files:
DRAFT ELSS End-Of-Semester Report Block Schedule Analysis |
|||
UPDATES AND BRIEF REPORTS: | |||
Topic | Person(s) Responsible | Notes | |
Next semester project team schedule | Braden | • Project team will likely meet every other week, on alternate weeks from our Ad Astra coach conference calls. Schedule to be determined later. |
|
ACTION ITEMS: | |||
Question | Person(s) Responsible | Notes and Decision(s) | Next Steps |
What is the approval process for draft ELSS report? | Braden |
• Final draft will be sent to project team next Wednesday, Dec. 12th, followed by an email vote on Friday, Dec. 14th. • If/when approved, report will be sent to senates, deans, chairs, administrative assistants, instructional services assistants, and any other constituencies or individuals who request it. |
• Team should provide any final feedback on draft prior to Friday, Dec. 14th, focusing on business practice and next steps. |
DISCUSSION ITEMS: | |||
Question | Person(s) Responsible | Notes and Next Steps | |
How will enrollment management/optimization team develop block scheduling criteria? | Braden |
• Future enrollment management/optimization group will be looking at how to best schedule courses into common blocks of time by default, and determining a process whereby exceptions are requested for pedagogical or other student-centered reasons based on rules that are developed. • Chair shared and discussed a spreadsheet representing the bulk of the block scheduling patterns for full-term classes on campus. • Sixty-three percent of our offered classes are three-unit, lecture-only, 0.200 FTE classes taught two days per week. We would like to see other classes either start at a common clock time with these, or end before a common clock time. (The second most common class pattern is three-unit, lecture/lab, 0.283-0.300 FTE classes; 10:30-11:50am is most common class time.) • Team will need assistance from Ad Astra to help pull analytical data that can inform the process. • Next step: identify classes that are not on common block schedule times and send out questionnaires to departments/deans to learn more about reasons classes are not on block schedule so we have data to consider moving forward. |
|
ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION: | |||
Topic | Contact Person | ||
NA | |||
OTHER INFORMATION: The ARC Enterprise Level Scheduling System Implementation team will be focusing upon the installation, configuration, and operational protocols of the scheduling software, not building ARC’s Academic schedules. |