Notes - Approved
Meeting Notes
Emilie MITCHELL
Roger Davidson
Sara Smith-Silverman
David McCusker
Jennifer Laflam
Alejandra Garcia
Bee Curiel
Mario Rodriguez
Mary Goodall
Christopher Nguyen Pheneger
Corey Winfield
Anjelica Lopez
Joshua Johnson
Jazzie Muganzo Murphy
Christopher Collins
| NAME OF COUNCIL/TEAM: Disproportionate Impact: LGBTQIA+ (2020-2021) | |||
| OBJECTIVE OF MEETING: Finalize edits of the current report, brainstorm questions for community organization listening session, get updates on listening sessions | |||
| DATE OF MEETING: 01/20/2021 TIME: 10:00am |
LOCATION/ROOM #: Zoom CALL-IN NUMBER: CALL-IN CODE: |
||
| FACILITATOR(S): Emilie Mitchell & Roger Davidson | |||
| ASSISTANT: Mary Goodall | |||
| MEMBERS PRESENT: Bee Curiel, Roger Davidson, Alejandra Garcia, Mary Goodall, Joshua Johnson, Jennifer Laflam, David McCusker, Emilie MITCHELL, Christopher Nguyen Pheneger | |||
| INVITED GUEST(S): | |||
| SUPPORTING RESOURCES (ITEMS READ IN PREPARATION FOR AND/OR BROUGHT TO MEETING): | |||
|
Attached Files:
Latest Report Version (2021-01-14) |
|||
| UPDATES AND BRIEF REPORTS: | |||
| Topic | Person(s) Responsible | Notes | |
| Update on student listening sessions | Alej | -There was a small turnout to the QTBIPOC group, members are looking into a quick reschedule. -There was great supportive evidence from participants of the main group. -We had a lengthy discussion on how to distribute the information throughout the report: -Using quotes for impact. -Using stories to illustrate needs. -Telling about positive things that ARC has or does (Instructors that are inclusive and have changed content to be more representative) -Telling negative things that ARC has or does (too few gender neutral bathrooms, Instructors that refuse to use pronouns) -We would like to use quotes and information from the surveys in the same meaningful ways. |
|
| ACTION ITEMS: | |||
| Question | Person(s) Responsible | Notes and Decision(s) | Next Steps |
| Any feedback on the report intro (Roger) or the art dedication/explanation (Bee) | Roger & Bee |
10 |
-The team worked on edits to the introduction and we have finalized where we want it to be. |
| How should we best divide up the reference confirmations for the document? | Emilie |
15 |
|
| DISCUSSION ITEMS: | |||
| Question | Person(s) Responsible | Notes and Next Steps | |
| What questions/topics should be raised in the community organization listening session? | Bee |
-The listening session sub team will pull a few questions together and send them out to confirm wording before the session. -The cover art will be added tp the report so we can better see any refinements that may be necessary. |
|
| ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION: | |||
| Topic | Contact Person | ||
| TBD | Roger | ||
| OTHER INFORMATION: The most important edits we went over were for the counseling services section, which we added under the Pride Center, and the facilities needs in recommendations. | |||