Agenda - Approved

Meeting Agenda

NAME OF COUNCIL/TEAM: Professional Development and Training (2019-2020)
OBJECTIVE OF MEETING: Review & revise draft documents
DATE OF MEETING: 11/15/2019 TIME: 1:30am	LOCATION/ROOM #: Student Center Board Room CALL-IN NUMBER: CALL-IN CODE:
FACILITATOR(S): Alisa Shubb & Olga Prizhbilov
ASSISTANT: Beth Hartline
INVITED GUEST(S):
SUPPORTING RESOURCES (ITEMS READ IN PREPARATION FOR AND/OR BROUGHT TO MEETING):
Attached Files: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1orPF2TEZkVoYKyzINAMwvY3aDa4Ti80h Professional Development draft structure Sample Competencies Essential Conditions for Professional Development draft V1
UPDATES AND BRIEF REPORTS
Topic	Person(s) Responsible	Time Alloted
PD meetings with Thomas Greene - report back	Alisa, Olga, Pam, Corrine, Jen	10 min.
ACTION ITEMS:
Question	Person(s) Responsible	Time Allotted
Which draft structure best suits our needs? 1) Version 3a - utilizing a thematic approach directly tied to elements of the Institutional Equity Plan 2) Version 3b - utilizing a simplified approach organized by competencies (to be determined)	Alisa	10 min.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Question	Person(s) Responsible	Time Allotted
Is there any additional feedback or input for earlier work? a) barriers to participation b) philosophy of professional development	Alisa	5 min.
Review Essential Conditions: what feedback, input, or clarifications do we have for the following areas ? a) ample staffing b) thoughtful input c) appropriate space d) sufficient time e) supportive management culture	Alisa	15 min.
Considering the idea of individual PD plans: -are these an essential condition? -how can we clarify this idea? -how might individual PD plans be realized in our current system?	Alisa	15 min.
Review Suggested Classified Employee Competencies and consider the following: - would these competencies comprehensively address classified professional development needs? - could these competencies also be used to accurately describe faculty and management professional development needs / if not, what additional competencies would need to be added? - how well do these competencies address PD needs described in the Institutional Equity Plan? - how well does the language/title of each of these competencies resonate?	Alisa	30 min.
ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION:
Topic		Contact Person
How might we test the comprehensiveness of the PD competencies and how well they resonate with all ARC educator employees?
How can new employee training ensure that incoming hired are prepared for their individual job function AND to support ARC goals and participation in the college environment?
OTHER INFORMATION: