Notes - Approved

Meeting Notes

Frank Kobayashi
Nicole Porter
Melanie Ortega
BJ Snowden
Hannah Blodgett
Carina Hoffpauir
Mikhail Drobot
Justin Tseng
Eliza Arata
Sharon Gott
Marianne Harris
Brian Knirk
Nimo Ali
David Shrope-Austin
Caroline Prieto
Allyson Joye
Tera Reynolds
Arthur Jenkins
Anthony Carter
Kim Herrell
Liz Geisser
Dianne Cervantez
Maria Elena Pulido-Sepulveda

NAME OF COUNCIL/TEAM: Student Success Council
OBJECTIVE OF MEETING: Update FYE Action-ARC Online 2.0
DATE OF MEETING: 04/02/2019
TIME: 1:00pm - 3:00pm
LOCATION/ROOM #: Submarine Conference Room
CALL-IN NUMBER:
CALL-IN CODE:
FACILITATOR(S): Sarah Lehmann, Lisa Aguilera Lawrenson
ASSISTANT: Teresa Helms
MEMBERS PRESENT: Adam Karp, Lisa Lawrenson, Sarah Lehmann, Kate Williamson, Susan Andre, Eliza Arata, Pamela Chao, Jennifer Laflam, Nicole Moise, Gladis Sanchez Pantoja, Jeffrey Stephenson, Teresa Wigner,
INVITED GUEST(S):
SUPPORTING RESOURCES (ITEMS READ IN PREPARATION FOR AND/OR BROUGHT TO MEETING):
Attached Files:
Program Paths - Final Report
DI Project Initiation
Institutional Equity Plan
Draft ARC Distance Education Plan 2019-2025 v3
SEA Draft C - For Second Reading
 
UPDATES AND BRIEF REPORTS:
Topic Person(s) Responsible Notes
FYE Update Lisa Lawrenson
The FYE team is completing its work. Since ACHIEVE is implementing parts of a FYE in their work, it makes sense for the SSC to make the recommendation that the report go to the ACHIEVE team to consider. We can ask ACHIEVE to report back to us about how they used the recommendations to implement FYE.
Center for Urban Education (CUE) and SEA Plan Update Lisa Lawrenson, Kate Williamson, Adam Karp, Jeff Stephenson
Members of the SSC team (Lisa, Adam, Jeff, Pam, Jen, Kate)  attended CUE. CUE assisted the team with the SEA plan, but even more so with the IEP. CUE will be reviewing the IEP and providing ARC with feedback.

ELSS - Protocols Lisa Lawrenson
Kale Braden shared that the ELSS protocols will be delayed due to ongoing development with DO and Ad Astra. The ELSS team will report on protocols in fall 2019. Kale is working with the vendor for protocols.
Institutional Equity Plan Pam Chao and Adam Karp
The draft of the Institutional Equity Plan was discussed. It discussed the three levels of equity: Personal Equity, Educational/Professional Equity, Institutional Equity. Professional development is a significant component of the plan. The IEP does not focus on implementation, as that will be determined later and those responsible for implementation will proceed with how to operationalize the plan.  Need programs to disproportionate students.  May need to make changes when CCCIO will send us an update.  Natomas Center and Main Campus 2019-2022 Student Equity and Achievement Plan.  They change equity data but ARC is using the local data for our college.  Need a DI Group to function on justice for disproportionate students.  Equity is not a pie where you get a piece of a pie, need to close huge gap.  AB705 is doing a lot for the achievement gap to help students, Jeff stated that Financial Aid has 10-12 officers divide financial aid into office, 3-4 people doing CAL Grants, 3-4 people doing loans, 3-4 people that know Cal Grants and speed up financial awards. WAC/RAD providing WAC and RAD support to MMLC.  Jennifer Laflam provided a correct report.  Institutional Equity Plan Summary:  Peoples experience, town hall meeting, mini lit reviews need sounded professional development.  Students and Groups give guidance a lens to evaluate we are doing and constraints, create, improve climate 
Trauma Informed Care Sarah Lehmann
Trauma informed care training will be provided with support from the CTL.  Trauma informed care training at the Chancellors Office and ELT.  Thomas is in agreement for training across campus, when and where beyond college hour CTE Program, Perkins dollars using for ECE Trauma.  
ACTION ITEMS:
Question Person(s) Responsible Notes and Decision(s) Next Steps
ARC Online 2.0 - Second Reading Lisa Lawrenson and Sarah Lehmann 0
Unanimously approved to proceed to ELT. Some suggestions on equity to be considered, particularly in terms of using more equity-minded language and eliminating deficit -minded language.
DI Project Initiation Form Lisa Lawrenson and Sarah Lehmann Unanimously approved to go to ELT.
SEA-2nd Reading Lisa Lawrenson and Sarah Lehmann SEA plan was unanimously approved with the understanding that the data will be updated as the CCCCO provides updates.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Question Person(s) Responsible Notes and Next Steps
Program Paths-1st Reading Sarah Lehmann Approved unanimously on first reading. Group commends committee make-up and incredible work accomplished by the team.
Governance Evaluation Process Adam Karp Adam Karp discussed the evaluation of the new governance plan. This evaluation will include a survey of the councils and project teams, entire college, and qualitative evaluation of councils.
ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION:
Topic Contact Person
NA