Notes - Approved
Meeting Notes
Emilie MITCHELL
Roger Davidson
Sara Smith-Silverman
David McCusker
Jennifer Laflam
Alejandra Garcia
Bee Curiel
Mario Rodriguez
Mary Goodall
Christopher Nguyen Pheneger
Corey Winfield
Anjelica Lopez
Joshua Johnson
Jazzie Muganzo Murphy
Christopher Collins
| NAME OF COUNCIL/TEAM: Disproportionate Impact: LGBTQIA+ (2020-2021) | |||
| OBJECTIVE OF MEETING: To finalize the details of the student resource panel and to review any edits for the sections of the report in progress. | |||
| DATE OF MEETING: 10/19/2020 TIME: 10:00am |
LOCATION/ROOM #: Zoom CALL-IN NUMBER: CALL-IN CODE: |
||
| FACILITATOR(S): Emilie Mitchell & Roger Davidson | |||
| ASSISTANT: Mary Goodall | |||
| MEMBERS PRESENT: Christopher Collins, Bee Curiel, Roger Davidson, Alejandra Garcia, Mary Goodall, Jennifer Laflam, David McCusker, Emilie MITCHELL, Christopher Nguyen Pheneger, Sara Smith, Corey Winfield, | |||
| INVITED GUEST(S): None | |||
| SUPPORTING RESOURCES (ITEMS READ IN PREPARATION FOR AND/OR BROUGHT TO MEETING): | |||
|
Attached Files:
Draft LGBTQIA+ DI Report |
|||
| UPDATES AND BRIEF REPORTS: | |||
| Topic | Person(s) Responsible | Notes | |
| Progress on the first 3 sections | Emilie Mitchell | Some people discussed having issues viewing some of the documents in Google Docs. They will be resent and a few more days will be allotted for viewing. |
|
| ACTION ITEMS: | |||
| Question | Person(s) Responsible | Notes and Decision(s) | Next Steps |
|
0 |
|||
| DISCUSSION ITEMS: | |||
| Question | Person(s) Responsible | Notes and Next Steps | |
| Student resource panel and timing Will everyone read the responses or a subgroup? What criteria do we want to use to select the SRP in the event there are more than 18 respondents? What will be the format for the SRP (special or existing meeting, all or subgroup attendees, true synchronous panel or sequential)? When to schedule the meeting(s)? What do we want to talk with them about? | All |
There were some important decisions to make concerning the questions and the timing for the student resource panel, so we really spent a considerable amount of time on this: - 12 of the 18 people invited have responded to our pre-panel questionairre, but not all are willing to participate in the actual panel so we will be advertising via a few more departments and social media platforms. - We decided to chose our panel based with thought to intersectionality, the need for students of color, gender non-conforming, and potentially students that were here pre-online exclusive Covid-19 era. |
|
| Discussion of sections 4 & 5 o LGBTQ+ Student Success in Higher Education o Why ARC? (Can anyone suggest a better name?) | All |
Due to some time issues we didn't go over these sections and prioritized those that are dues on 10/21/2020. |
|
| Brainstorming of possible recommendations | All |
In our brainstorming session we discussed the needs for different funding sources, a better orginizational structure (all the way to DO), and a DO level liaison to assist ARC and our sister colleges. |
|
| ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION: | |||
| Topic | Contact Person | ||
| NA | |||
| OTHER INFORMATION: The team discussed the various writing style and will be using APA. | |||